The Student Court released the reasoning behind their decision earlier this year in Boyer v. Joint Elections Committee, the decision that kept Kyle Boyer off of the Student Association runoff ballot.
Boyer was removed from the SA presidential runoff ballot in March after he failed to report the fair market value for the use of a friend’s car on an election expenditure report.
Boyer brought up a case against the JEC – the SA elections oversight body – claiming they made an arbitrary and capricious decision as to the value of the jeep, a decision which effectively removed Boyer from the runoff ballot.
The Court ruled in favor of the JEC’s decision to keep Boyer off of the ballot, claiming they did not want to take away from the JEC’s power.
Below is the Court’s reasoning behind their decision:
In a 2-1 decision, this court finds in favor of the defendant.
In finding for the defendant, this court affirms the standards of review elucidated in Ferguson v. JEC. We continue to give the JEC broad discretion and will only disturb a sanction imposed by the JEC upon a showing of abuse of discretion by the JEC.
Here, the JEC was charged with determining the fair market value of the use of a candidate’s friend’s vehicle on H Street. Even if we feel that we would have come to a different conclusion as to the value, we acknowledge the difficulty of this task and the superior position of the JEC to accomplish it. We decline to substitute our judgment for the judgment of the JEC when, as here, we could find no abuse of discretion.
Therefore, this Court orders:
that JEC Order S09-056 be affirmed,
that JEC Order S09-057 be affirmed, and
that the order of disqualification against Mr. Boyer be affirmed.

